divided opinion border line

It is common in the politician’s speech how to appeal one’s opinion by insisting your points and criticizing opponents opinion. Now controversial war related draft is at the midst of criticizing opponents opinion involving all kinds of citizen  with unprecedented scale.

 

My standpoint is a little bit different. Even though I am definitely against the hot debated war related draft, but I should like to analysis the main debate point from more neutral point of view.

 

For example in this case, critical point that either party cannot meet halfway must be whether to allow even one member from the Japanese self defense force to be involved in war related accidental death. Japanese citizen are peace keeping mindset with majority opinion not to accept this kind of death.

 

On  the other hand, it is true that SDF mission is saving the life of citizen even at the toll of their death on emergency case. And opponent opinion is that death by war involvement can be the similar kind.

 

In this way I would like to clarify other border lines that both opinion cannot make concession.